
Super Mario Galaxy is finally hitting stores and getting into our hands this week. While I wasn’t overly excited about another helping of Mario this time on the Wi, I have been strangely drawn to it over the last couple of weeks. Just finally playing the demo at my local Gamestop has made me become a fanatic about Galaxy and can’t wait to sit down to finally play it tomorrow night. Here is a round up from some of the online and print publications review of Super Mario Galaxy.
Deeko - 100%
It’s rare to play through a perfect game or one that nears perfection, but Galaxy definitely fits that mold.
Read the full review here.
GamePro - 100%
Super Mario Galaxy raises the bar in terms of what can be achieved on the Wii. Galaxy is the kind of game that you’re going to want to take your time with because there is just so much to do in the game. This is the first game in a long time that I’ve actually gone back and replayed levels just for fun. It’s everything you loved about Mario 64 and nothing you hated about “Super Mario Sunshine.”
Read the full review here.
Game Informer - 98%
Once that nostalgic music rings out and Mario leaps into the air, all your complaints instantly vanish. This is, in my opinion, the best Mario game since the NES classic, Super Mario Bros. It innovates in a genre that we had thought we had seen everything from, and in doing so delivers some of the most entertaining gameplay to date.
Read the full review here.
Computer and Video Games - 95%
Galaxy’s real success is in its ability to surprise, which it does consistently from start to finish. Just when you think Nintendo’s out of ideas you’re blasted off to another world that’s even crazier and more creative than the last.
Read the full review here.
GameDaily - 90%
The at-times awkward Wii-mote controls and a tacked-on co-op mode keep the game from reaching perfection, but gravity-bending levels still manage to keep the game fresh from start to finish, while familiar characters and soundtrack hit all the right nostalgic notes.
Read the full review here.
Via MetaCritic